THE RABBLE UNDER THE RUBBLE: RAHM EMANUEL AND THE SESTAK SCANDAL

Barack Obama and "Pretty Ballerina" Rahm Emanuel

From 1991 until 2000, the Clinton White House ran much like one would expect any well-oiled totalitarian seat of government to run, complete with dirty tricks, subterfuge, and its own propaganda ministry. Rahm Emanuel headed up the “dirty tricks bureau” and John “I Vant to Sock Your Blod” Podesta, now founder and head of Media Matters, ran the propaganda ministry.

Sweet little operation.

Rahm was the guy who instituted the “no notes” policy for White House lawyers during the Clinton impeachment proceedings, the idea being that if White House lawyers didn’t take notes there would be no records to subpoena. This, a lesson learned from the mistakes of Nixon Watergate counsel John Dean. Dean took great notes and drew a four-year sentence, even after he ratted out the others.

In Emanuel and Posdesta we have possibly two of the greatest unindicted criminals in the history of American politics. These guys were “good … very good,” to quote Humphrey Bogart.

Well, Podesta still heads up propaganda for the Democratic Party, albeit in the private sector nowadays. Much of the dirt you read about Sarah Palin, James O’Keefe, Michele Bachmann and scores of other conservatives is hatched by him and his organization. It’s effective and many Republicans accept much of it as fact after it percolates into the mainstream media.

But Emanuel has kept his hand in government, most recently as Obama White House chief of staff, and, when one day all of the rubble is cleared away, in the Joe Sestak “Jobsgate” scandal, Rahm will be the rabble at the bottom of it.

The question is not whether Obama offered Congressman Sestak a job – he did. It isn’t even whether the White House and Joe are being truthful about what job was offered – they aren’t. The real question is whether or not the misfire Republicans on Capitol Hill can prove it.

In this entire debacle one idea has been put forth that makes sense. It is not a special prosecutor appointed by the Obama Justice Department or even a Washington-based FBI investigation. The best idea put forth – I believe it was on O’Reilly last week by Dick Morris – is that Republican Pennsylvania Attorney General, Tom Corbett, impanel a state grand jury into the bribe offered a sitting U.S. Representative in his state.

If he will do this, he will effectively circumvent any dog and pony show that Marc Rich Pardon architect Eric Holder conducts, and get to the most corrupt White House chief of staff in U.S. history.

THE DIRTY LITTLE IMMIGRATION LIE

Editor’s Note: Last November we posted an essay on one of the least reported scandals involving illegal immigration into the United States. Our focus was primarily on Mexico but the problem exists across the board and it is monumental. We have reedited and posted it again tonight to address the current situation in Arizona.

If your children or grandchildren are in school they are probably brainwashed five days a week by teachers or professors who have a Liberal agenda and who themselves were likely propagandize into progressivism.

They are grilled daily that liberalism is humane and conservatism is racist and intolerant. They are told that a government immigration policy that oppresses struggling migrants is nothing less than American arrogance, steeped in racial prejudice.

If you are a true conservative you know that they are either intentionally prevaricating or incredibly ignorant, but in either case they are subversive. Recently we researched an issue the Liberal media and academics seldom address and here are some facts you may not know about our racist immigration non-policy:

Every year – and even the government doesn’t have accurate figures – the State Department estimates that as many as 100,000 OTMs (Other Than Mexicans) are smuggled into the U.S. and auctioned into slavery to pedophiles and pornographers.

Long ago the Russian mob, many of them former KGB, learned that it is easier to bring human traffic http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/russia.htm into America through Mexico than to take it out.

If anyone is kidnapped in this country, the full force of government is brought to bear; in Mexico it is barely noticed. Thousands of women and children from all over the world are lured to Mexico every year by these mobsters, and then kidnapped and sold via the Internet.

Considering these shocking statistics, one has to wonder just what motive some in the U.S. government—senators, congressmen, judges and others—have for not taking action on our borders to stem the tide of illegals arriving every day.

Well, that’s the $1 billion question, now, isn’t it?

During last September’s ACORN scandal one would have thought the networks and every news outlet in the country would have scrambled to fully expose the sex trade operation inside that radical group, but instead the media stampeded to “out” Andrew Breitbart at BigGovernment.com.

It would be great if we could mark this off as a conspiracy theory but it is no theory. Anyone who has worked in Hollywood after dark knows that white and child slavery is prospering here. And thousands more young women are moved against their will to Saudi Arabia, Japan and other countries around the world.

I’ve said before that I am not a conspiracy theorist and I’m not, but neither am I naïve. I was pursuing a music career at 17 in Hollywood, and there is virtually nothing I haven’t seen. I’ve seen nine and 10-year-old girls hooking on Sunset Blvd; I’ve seen boys only slightly older doing the same on Selma Avenue.

Who stands to gain in the merchandizing of human life? Well, I am always more fascinated than shocked whenever I watch Bill O’Reilly expose judges who release pedophiles back into society, or state legislators who refuse to help pass Jessica’s Law.

The dirty little secret on illegal immigration is that on this side of the border people are making vast sums of money to keep traffic flowing. It stands to reason that many of those people hold important positions in our government.

It is a relatively simple thing to stem the tide of illegals passing into the U.S. if we have a desire to do so, but it will take the support and activism of the American taxpayer.

We have seen the depths of depravity to which so-call “community organizations” will go to advance their radical agenda in the United States, and even good men have turned their heads.

John McCain is on Fox News almost nightly decrying the situation on the Mexican border as though it all erupted last year. This is a decades-old nightmare for tens of thousands of women and children.
Even those in the mainstream media who are aware of this epidemic brand those of us who call for extreme measures to end human trafficking as racists.

While Barack Obama fuels racial hatred over Arizona’s new immigration laws thousands of people are undergoing unspeakable horrors. It is time for every honest American to stand with Arizona in this fight. It is time politicians like John McCain stop pandering for votes and do something about illegal immigration.

THE OTHER N-WORD AND THE MAINSTREAM LEFT

When Rush Limbaugh yelled into the golden EIB microphone at “Femi-Nazis” in the 1990s, only the dimwits in Rio Lindo believed that he actually meant they were Nazis. Rush was using hyperbole to drive home a larger point.

That isn’t the interpretation Katie Couric would have you believe, but it is nonetheless true.

The use of metaphor and hyperbole is a recognized journalistic mechanism used to put forth a salient point. Glenn Beck has used the Nazi comparison in likening many of the Obama and Bush administrations’ methods, and, while it is not hyperbole, he makes an historical argument.

Right now the so-called “mainstream” media and Democrat politicians are fueling Arizona protests by leftist front groups by implying that the state’s new alien identification law is racist, akin to apartheid and Nazism. This week both Couric and Diane Sawyer shamefully represented the dispute as racist.

This is not hyperbole or metaphor.

The difference being, when the Left calls you a Nazi or the equivalent of one, they mean it literally. They want the world to think you are dangerous, that you present a threat to human life. Al Sharpton, the poster boy for race-baiting rhetoric, means it when he calls Arizonans racists and Nazis.

The American Jewish community and every African American citizen should be outraged when Couric and the others use the disingenuous journalistic mechanism, “some say this is akin to Nazi Germany …” to create fear where no threat exits.

But it works.

Even Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush are running for the boondocks to distance themselves from the Arizona law. Why? Fear of minority voter backlash. Never mind that the Cuban migration of the 20th century had nothing in common with the mass invasion on the Mexican border.

Nothing any Bush does surprises me but Rubio is a disappointment.

Why is the Left so upset about this law? Let’s be clear: it does not give Arizona law enforcement the right to randomly stop and demand anyone’s legal status, in fact it specifically prevents it. They cannot arbitrarily, as Sharpton and Keith Olbermann suggest, inspect anyone’s “papers.”

What does the Arizona law actually do? In a nutshell: it requires proof of citizenship before and person can vote and receive social services; it requires valid identification (not papers, but a state ID, driver’s license or green card) to secure employment. It requires everyone – white, black, Hispanic and everything in between – to carry ID.

It requires that one must have legal status to be here. Anyone who has been through airport security in the last 10 years realizes that that is not too much to ask.

At the end of the day, friends, this is about Democratic votes, illegal votes, and if Republicans and the American people cave in to it, our most precious freedom is gone.